Library Catalogue

My Cart

Civilian oversight of the police in major cities / Darrel W. Stephens, Scrivner Ellen, Josie F. Cambareri.

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Location

Canadian Policing Research Catalogue

Resource

e-Books

Authors

Publishers

Bibliography

Includes bibliographical references.

Description

1 online resource (vii, 40 pages)

Summary

"Although not generally acknowledged by the public, police agencies have always had civilian oversight through elected mayors, city councils, prosecutors’ offices, court decisions, and state and federal legislation. Since the early 1960s, other forms of oversight have been developed in the hope of ensuring greater police accountability and community trust. In the earliest cases, a number of cities established civilian police commissions or boards (Los Angeles; Chicago; Kansas City, Missouri; and Detroit are examples) that played a role in the selection of the chief, policy development, and discipline. Since the late 1960s, other forms of civilian oversight have emerged."--Page 1.

Subject

Online Access

Contents

1. Introduction. -- 2. Civilian oversight survey. -- Prevalence of civilian oversight. -- Civilian oversight model types and board characteristics. -- Characteristics of oversight bodies. -- 3. Round table discussion. -- Agency presentations. -- Civilian oversight issues. -- 4. Conclusion. -- 5. References. -- 6. Appendix A. Civilian oversight survey. -- Civilian oversight of police. -- 7. Appendix B. Round table participants. -- 8. Appendix C. Round table agenda.

Date modified: